Legal Opinion

State v. Makinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2001No. 98CF2148FE; A104864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CENICEROS, S. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for attempted murder, unlawful use of a weapon, and attempted assault in the first degree. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his request for a new attorney. We review for abuse of discretion, State v. Keerins, 145 Or App 491, 494-95, 932 P2d 65 (1996), and affirm.

A detailed recitation of facts is not necessary because defendant alleges a procedural error. Defendant has two children by a former girlfriend. In July 1998, defendant and his former girlfriend had a telephone conversation about the children that greatly upset…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. SchmickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State v. Bargas-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. HugCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Tahvili v. Washington Mutual BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API