State v. Makinson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
CENICEROS, S. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for attempted murder, unlawful use of a weapon, and attempted assault in the first degree. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his request for a new attorney. We review for abuse of discretion, State v. Keerins, 145 Or App 491, 494-95, 932 P2d 65 (1996), and affirm.
A detailed recitation of facts is not necessary because defendant alleges a procedural error. Defendant has two children by a former girlfriend. In July 1998, defendant and his former girlfriend had a telephone conversation about the children that greatly upset…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. SchmickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. Bargas-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. HugCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Tahvili v. Washington Mutual BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.