State v. Hickey
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175. He asserts that the court erred when it denied his motion for a continuance that he made on the day of trial. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial.
On June 8,1984, defendant was arraigned. The court determined that he was indigent and appointed a member of the Multnomah County Public Defender’s Office as his counsel. While attempting to negotiate a “plea bargain,” the parties jointly requested and obtained two continuances from the court. The negotiations, however, failed to produce an agreement, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WolferOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. ZahaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. SassariniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. KindlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. LoboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. LingrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.