Legal Opinion
In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real Property From City of Seminole
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 10, 2009No. 104212PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
11 The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in determining that a binding settlement agreement had been reached in this matter based upon the parties' discussions and correspondence. This Court holds that the evidence of the parties' negotiations does not demonstrate mutual assent to the terms of a settlement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
T2 This is the second appeal in this matter. The decision in the first appeal reversed summary judgment for the City of Seminole (City). In re De-annexation of Certain Real Property, 2006 OK CIV APP 103, 143 P.3d 228.
T3 In 1976, City annexed the Sinclair…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Ollie v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Russell v. COUNTY COM'RS OF CARTER COUNTYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Prickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Young v. RollerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Appointment of Umpire for Hayes Family Trust v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Walters v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Dunbar Engineering Corp. v. Rhinosystems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- In re Amending & Revising Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Civil-No. 1.7, 3.26, 6.16, 21.4, 21.7, 23.10, & 23.31Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- D-Mil Production, Inc. v. Dkmt, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.