Legal Opinion

Walters v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 8, 2013No. 11-5130PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Bennie Walters brought employment discrimination claims against his former employer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”). The parties reached an apparent settlement during a settlement conference, but Walters later refused to sign the written agreement. The district court granted Wal-Mart’s motion to enforce the agreement and denied Walters’ motion for reconsideration. Walters appeals both rulings.

Before reaching the merits of the appeal, we must resolve a jurisdictional dispute borne of the district court’s failure to enter its judgment in a separate document as required…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Reece v. AES CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Hiob v. Progressive American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Simmons v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API