Legal Opinion
Dunbar Engineering Corp. v. Rhinosystems, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 6, 2010No. 106,109. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEBORAH B. BARNES, Judge.
¶ 1 Rhinosystems, Inc., appeals the trial court’s Order Compelling Arbitration filed on June 25, 2008, in which the trial court ordered Rhinosystems and Dunbar Engineering Corporation (Dunbar), to “proceed to arbitrate [their] controversy in accordance with the terms of the arbitration provision contained in the Engineering Services Proposal....” We find that the trial court erred in refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on Dunbar’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and in overruling Rhinosystems’s Motion to Reconsider. Therefore, we reverse and remand this case to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Hardin v. First Cash Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Ameristar Coil Processing, LLC v. William E. Buffington Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Born v. Progrexion TeleservicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- MAGEL v. NUVEENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023
- MAGEL v. NUVEENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.