Legal Opinion
People v. Cotton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that *837Supreme Court erred in denying his motion for severance. By pleading guilty, defendant waived his right to seek appellate review of the denial of that motion (see, People v Baez, 205 AD2d 695, lv denied 84 NY2d 822; People v Welcome, 184 AD2d 916, lv denied 80 NY2d 935; People v Flagg, 155 AD2d 552). We further conclude that the sentence, which was agreed upon as part of defendant’s plea, is not unduly harsh or severe (see, People v Tejeda, 217 AD2d 932; People v Kohler, 147 AD2d 937, lv denied 73 NY2d 1017). (Appeal from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. TejedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. KohlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. FlaggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. WelcomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WelsherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. CrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. McGhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.