Legal Opinion

People v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, the verdict is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Defendant freely bargained for the maximum sentence upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in satisfaction of pending charges of, inter alia, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see, People v Kohler, 147 AD2d 937,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CottonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. KohlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SacconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API