Legal Opinion
People v. Crooks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment convicting him of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2]; § 1193 [1] [c]) and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea allocution was factually insufficient (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly accepted the plea without conducting further inquiry to ensure that defendant was waiving an alleged defense to the charge.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. LococoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. BurgeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. CrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. MarvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001