Legal Opinion
People v. Kohler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. Defendant received the sentence for which he had freely bargained (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306; People v Martinez, 124 AD2d 505, 506). We have considered the remaining issues raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief and find each one of them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. —sodomy, first degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. TejedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CottonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. FairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.