Legal Opinion

Pacific Indemnity Company v. Run-A-Ford Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1964No. 6 Div. 712PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal by an automobile liability insurer from a decree declaring that insurer is obligated, by the terms of its policy, (1) to defend an action for personal injury which an injured party, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, had brought against insured, and (2) to pay, up to the policy limits, any final judgment which might be rendered in favor of plaintiff and against insured in said action.

The complainant in this suit for declaratory decree is a corporation engaged in the business of delivering packages for various merchants. The respondent, Porter, op■erates a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. C. B. White & Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. HilderbrandtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ladner Co., Inc. v. Southern Guaranty Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Porterfield v. Audubon Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Tanner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. HARTFORD INS. v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API