Legal Opinion

People v. Howe

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1934No. Crim. 2502PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Appellant was convicted in counts 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 of grand theft and in counts 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 of violation of the Corporate Securities Act, each of the five latter offenses growing out of the same transaction as that referred to in the count of grand theft immediately preceding it. He contends that the trial court should have dismissed the case under Penal Code, section 1382, because it was continued for trial for a period in excess of sixty days after the finding of the indictment.

Much of the time thus lost was occasioned by the action of appellant in pleading…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. JudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. LancellottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. People v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. People v. RallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. KrugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API