Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Krug

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1935No. Crim. 2799PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

Appellant was convicted after trial by jury of burglary in the second degree. This appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution (People v. Dukes, 90 Cal. App. 657, 659 [266 Pac. 558]), the facts in the instant case are:

Appellant was indicted for burglary of the house of Mrs. Mayer between 1 and 4 o’clock P. M. on April 24, 1935. Personal property of a value of approximately $3,000 was taken Mrs. Burke, the next door neighbor of Mrs. Meyer, on the date of the burglary was sitting on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. SieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. BurkhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. People v. DukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. WillmurthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. DuBoisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. RallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API