People v. George
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
All defendants were convicted in the superior court of two crimes: (1) rape, and (2) conspiracy to commit rape. At judgment, the court ordered the sentences for the two offenses to run concurrently. From the judgment after jury verdicts, all defendants appealed. Motions for new trial and probation were denied..
Three contentions are made: (1) the trial court erred in denying defendants ’ motions to dismiss the indictments for lack of a speedy trial; (2) the testimony of the prosecutrix is inherently incredible, and therefore there is insufficient evidence to support the verdicts; and (3)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. GodlewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Barker v. Municipal Court of the Salinas Judicial District of Monterey CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. KarsaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re La CroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. ChurchillArizona Supreme Court · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.