Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1931No. Docket No. 2036PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Defendant was charged by an information containing three counts with (1) violation of section 112 of the California Vehicle Act; (2) manslaughter, and (3) violation of section 141 of the California Vehicle Act. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on each count. From an order denying a motion for new trial and from the judgments of conviction entered upon said verdicts the defendant has appealed.

The case grew out of a collision which occurred on Crenshaw Boulevard in the city of Los Angeles on July 24, 1930, at about 7 o’clock P. M., when a Cadillac car in which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ScofieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. BellahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. HoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. MosleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API