Legal Opinion

DeJesus v. DeJesus

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1997PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether and to what extent an interest in restricted stock and stock option benefit plans provided by a spouse’s employer constitutes marital property for the purposes of equitable distribution, where the plans come into being during the marriage but are contingent on the spouse’s continued employment with the company after the divorce. Because we conclude that the record was insufficient to allow the Trial Judge to make that determination, we reverse and remit to Supreme Court for further proceedings.

The parties were married on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Burns v. BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Olivo v. OlivoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. In Re the Marriage of ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Fields v. FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Baccanti v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Armstrong v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API