Burns v. Burns
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
In this matrimonial action, the primary issue is whether the trial court erred by limiting the wife’s proof of the value of her husband’s interest in his law firm partnership to the value of his capital account. We conclude that there was error and we modify the Appellate Division order accordingly.
Plaintiff, Francine L. Burns, and defendant, Edward J. Burns, were married on December 30, 1972, subsequent to defendant’s achieving partnership status, in January 1972, at Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, a Rochester law firm. At the time Mrs. Burns was 21 years of age…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Olivo v. OlivoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Amodio v. AmodioNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Hartog v. HartogNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- DeJesus v. DeJesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Fields v. FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.