Legal Opinion

Penny v. Burch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1997No. 93-01879-CV; CA A91553PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

This case concerns the propriety of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on plaintiff’s1 claim to a 30-foot easement for a roadway across defendant’s property. Specifically, defendant appeals from a final “judgment-order”2 granting plaintiff an implied easement across the east 30 feet of defendant’s property and permanently enjoining defendant from obstructing or interfering with the use of the easement. We reverse and remand.

The following facts are- undisputed. Plaintiff Penny and defendant Burch are purchasers of two adjoining tracts of land situated on the north side of Highway 140…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cheney v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eagles Five, LLC v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Dayton v. JordanCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Manusos v. SkeelsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Fischer v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Miller v. ShenkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API