Legal Opinion

Miller v. Shenk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 2015No. 161124908; A152844PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

In this action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, ORS 28.010 to 28.160, defendants Terry and Trudy Shenk appeal from a judgment for plaintiff Douglas Miller declaring that plaintiff has an implied easement over defendants’ property for access to plaintiffs undeveloped forest land. Defendants contend that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the action for failure to join neighboring property owners who defendants contend are necessary parties. On the merits, defendants contend that clear and convincing evidence does not support the trial court’s ruling. Because we agree with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kellas v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wright v. Hazen Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Vance v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Fox v. Country Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DaMota v. JahnigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API