Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided July 13, 1998No. C.A. 90-484PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TORRES, District Judge.

The United States commenced this action, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.t to recover response costs associated with remediating a hazardous waste site. The original defendants were United Technologies Corp. (“UTC”) and eight other potentially responsible parties (“PRP’s”). The United States has moved for entry of a partial consent decree resolving all claims against UTC and forty-seven of the 138 third and fourth-party defendants against whom UTC has asserted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Charter International Oil Company, Acushnet Company, Proposed Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. United States of America v. Charles George Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Seymour Recycling Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1982
  5. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
  3. United States v. Fort James Operating Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  4. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
  5. United States v. Grand Rapids, MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API