Legal Opinion
United States v. Davis
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided September 28, 1998No. C.A. 90-484-TPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TORRES, District Judge.
United Technologies Corp. (“UTC”) seeks contribution pursuant to § 113(f)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERC-LA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(1), from seventeen parties (the “defendants”) 1 that UTC claims share liability for the costs incurred in cleaning up a hazardous waste site. The defendants include those who allegedly generated hazardous wastes found at the site (the “generator defendants”) 2 and those who allegedly transported hazardous waste to the site for disposal (the “transporter defendants”).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc., (Two Cases) in Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc., in Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
- Interfaith Community Organization v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Gladstone v. Stuart Cinemas, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- A. Shapiro & Sons, Inc. v. Rutland Waste & Metal Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.