Kanno v. Marwit Capital Partners II, L.P.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtFybel, J.
*991INTRODUCTION
The question posed by this appeal is whether a claim for breach of an oral agreement was barred by the parol evidence rule. The oral agreement was made in connection with a transaction by which three companies, of which Albert Kanno was the majority shareholder, were sold to two Delaware corporations. The transaction was documented principally by three writings, each of which had an integration clause.
A jury found in favor of Kanno and against Marwit Capital Partners II, L.P. (Marwit Capital) and Marwit Partners, LLC (Marwit LLC) on Kanno's claim for breach of the oral agreement.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- DCV Holdings, Inc. v. ConAgra, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Founding Members of Newport Beach Country Club v. Newport Beach Country Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bielski v. Coinbase Global, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- CTI III, LLC v. DevineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Harper v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Marriage of McConnell & JahnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- The Upper Deck Company v. Pixels.com, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026