Legal Opinion
The Upper Deck Company v. Pixels.com, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 9, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00923Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, Case No. 24-cv-00923-BAS-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING UPPER DECK’S MOTION IN LIMINE #1 (ECF 14 PIXELS.COM, LLC, No. 133); 15 Defendant. (2) GRANTING UPPER DECK’S 16 MOTION IN LIMINE #2 (ECF No. 134); 17 (3) DENYING UPPER DECK’S 18 MOTION IN LIMINE #3 (ECF 19 No. 135); 20 (4) GRANTING PIXELS’ MOTION IN LIMINE #1 (ECF 21 No. 136); 22 (5) GRANTING IN PART AND 23 DENYING IN PART PIXELS’ MOTION IN LIMINE #2 (ECF 24 No. 138); 25 (6) DENYING PIXELS’ MOTION 26 IN LIMINE #3 (ECF…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Shively v. BozanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- State Department of Public Health v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Alan Stuart G. Raleigh Hanbury v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, and Desert HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.