Remodeling Consultants, Inc. v. Builders Board
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This is an administrative review proceeding. Petitioner Remodeling Consultants, Inc., seeks judicial review of a determination and order by respondent Builders Board that petitioner is a “builder,” and must be licensed under the home builders licensing law (ORS 701.005 et seq). The Board imposed a fine of $1,000 upon petitioner for operating without a license.
The central issue is: Does petitioner’s business operation come within the definition of the term “builder” in ORS 701.005 (2) ?
OES 701.005 (2) provides:
“ ‘Builder’ means a person who, in the pursuit of an independent business,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. RawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- LaMar's Enterprises, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Whitney v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Thomas v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Banif Corporation v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mary's Fine Food, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Thoren v. Builders BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- MOLALLA PUMP AND HEATING COMPANY v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.