Legal Opinion

Remodeling Consultants, Inc. v. Builders Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 1974PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is an administrative review proceeding. Petitioner Remodeling Consultants, Inc., seeks judicial review of a determination and order by respondent Builders Board that petitioner is a “builder,” and must be licensed under the home builders licensing law (ORS 701.005 et seq). The Board imposed a fine of $1,000 upon petitioner for operating without a license.

The central issue is: Does petitioner’s business operation come within the definition of the term “builder” in ORS 701.005 (2) ?

OES 701.005 (2) provides:

“ ‘Builder’ means a person who, in the pursuit of an independent business,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. RawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. LaMar's Enterprises, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Whitney v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Thomas v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Banif Corporation v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mary's Fine Food, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Thoren v. Builders BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. MOLALLA PUMP AND HEATING COMPANY v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API