Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 1972No. 365-291PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This appeal involves the proper construction to be placed on a provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Law which authorizes payment of death benefits to certain so-called ‘common-law’ widows, ① not ■withstanding the fact that they were never formally married to the injured workmen with whom they lived.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment order of the circuit court for Multnomah County which affirmed an administrative decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board denying her benefits as a ‘common-law’ widow of a workman killed in an industrial accident.

The sole question is whether the circuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of JobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Norman v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Huard v. McTeighOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State Highway Commission v. HelliwellOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. ZusmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Whitney v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Remodeling Consultants, Inc. v. Builders BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. LaemoaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API