Legal Opinion
State v. Melick
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 6, 2006No. 54925-1-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
129 P.3d 816 (2006)
131 Wash.App. 835
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Matthew M. MELICK, Appellant.
No. 54925-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
March 6, 2006.
Dana M Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Erik Pedersen, Attorney at Law, Skagit Co. Prosecuting Atty Office, Mount Vernon, WA, for Respondent.
APPELWICK, A.C.J.
¶ 1 Matthew Melick contends that his convictions for taking of a motor vehicle (TMV) and possession of stolen property (PSP) for possessing that same vehicle violate double jeopardy. The State concedes that both convictions should not stand,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. DrumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. DrumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.