State v. Drum

¶1 Patrick B. Drum appeals his conviction of residential burglary, arguing that the findings of fact *610and evidence were insufficient to support his conviction and that the drug court contract he entered into and then terminated violated his right to due process. He raises additional issues in his statement of additional grounds and in the personal restraint petition consolidated with his appeal. Finding no error, we affirm his conviction and deny his personal restraint petition.

Armstrong, J.

*610FACTS

¶2 On the afternoon of September 28, 2004, Drum entered a Port Townsend residence. When the…