State v. Colquitt
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*792¶1 Mack Clarance Colquitt appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, following his termination from a drug court program. The agreement Colquitt entered into to participate in drug court was neither a stipulation that the substance in the underlying charge was a controlled substance nor a stipulation to the sufficiency of the evidence. And, although he agreed that the police report that included a field test of the substance could be admitted, there were no laboratory test results. We hold that the police report and field test were not sufficient evidence of a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State of Washington v. Dennis Wayne JussilaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State v. DrumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.