Legal Opinion
State v. Colquitt
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 29, 2006No. 32129-7-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
137 P.3d 892 (2006)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Mack Clarance COLQUITT, Appellant.
No. 32129-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
June 29, 2006.
Mary Katherine Young High, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.
Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
¶ 1 Mack Clarance Colquitt appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, following his termination from a drug court program. The agreement Colquitt entered into to participate in drug court was neither a stipulation that the substance in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State of Washington v. Dennis Wayne JussilaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State v. DrumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.