Legal Opinion
Scinto v. Sosin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 15, 1998No. AC 17441PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendants, Howard B. Sosin and Susan F. Sosin, appeal from an order of the trial court granting a temporary and permanent injunction barring them from forcing the plaintiffs into arbitration regarding a construction contract between the defendants and the plaintiff R. D. Scinto, Inc. (R. D. Scinto). The plaintiffs *224Barbara Scinto and Robert Scinto are guarantors of the obligations of the corporate plaintiff. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) failed to defer the issue of arbitrability to the arbitration panel, (2) determined that the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Stuart L. Bell v. Cendant Corporation, American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Jeffrey N. Mehler and Mary S. Russell v. The Terminix International Company L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Monette v. TinsleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Green v. Connecticut Disposal Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.