Legal Opinion

Marr v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1992No. 9106-03933; CA A71331PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Respondents (the Marrs) petitioned the trial court for an order compelling the appellant brokers to arbitrate 1 the Marrs’ state law claims 2 ' pursuant to clause 10 in the parties’ brokerage contract. 3 The parties had already been in arbitration before NASD regarding other claims, and a federal court had entered a stay of that arbitration. 4

The court denied the Marrs’ request to replace the arbitrators, and it ordered the arbitrators to determine whether the Marrs’ first claim for relief “states a cause of action that would either be eligible under NASD regulations, or is a claim not barred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nutbrown v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Rogers v. SaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hust v. Moore-Mccormick Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Geris v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muao v. Grosvenor Properties, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Weston Securities Corp. v. AykanianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Berger Farms v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Fonden v. U.S. Home Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Bush v. Paragon Property, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API