Legal Opinion

Berger Farms v. First Interstate Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 7, 1997No. 9509-06466; CA A91677PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Defendant, a national bank, appeals from two trial court orders that denied two motions it made pursuant to section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (9 USC §§ 1-16) to stay plaintiffs’ action and refer their claims to arbitration. The issue is whether plaintiffs’ claims fall within the scope of arbitration agreements among the parties. We vacate the second order and affirm in part and reverse in part the first order.

The arbitration agreements at issue are contained in two loan agreements and three continuing unconditional guarantees between defendant First Interstate Bank of Oregon and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Collins v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. Weston Securities Corp. v. AykanianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Bush v. Paragon Property, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Eure v. Cantrell Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API