Legal Opinion
State v. Threet
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1982No. CA A24418, A24604, A24605, A24606, A24607 and A24625 SC 28747PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
Appellants are witnesses who were subpoenaed to appear and testify before the Lane County grand jury. Each appeared and refused to testify, invoking constitutional provisions against self-incrimination, Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Pursuant to ORS 136.617-.619, 1 the state moved the circuit court to order the witnesses to testify. The circuit court ordered that each of the witnesses “is hereby compelled to testify * * * regarding the following: [areas of testimony were specified].” Each witness appealed from the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. BurlesonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Marriage of Strother v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.