People v. Hankins
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
The prosecution brought this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 to challenge the trial court's suppression of several murder confessions and other related statements by the defendant Terry Hankins. 1 Hankins initially confessed to police without first being advised of his Miranda rights. Soon after his initial confession, police advised Hankins of his Miranda rights, which he waived before giving his next three statements. Ruling that Hankins was in custody when he made his initial confession, the trial court granted his motion to suppress. The trial court also suppressed his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Effland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- People v. NullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Mumford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. CowartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- People v. HoltSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.