People v. Holt
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
In this interlocutory appeal filed by the prosecution, we review the trial court's order to suppress defendant Aaron Holt's incriminating statements because they were obtained in violation of his Miranda rights.1 We affirm.
In this case, six to nine armed police officers arrived at Holt's apartment to execute a search warrant. They knocked on the door loudly and announced, their presence. Holt's fiancée opened the door, and the police entered quickly with their weapons drawn. The lead detective moved directly toward Holt, putting his hand on Holt's shoulder and telling him not to move. Another…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Sewn NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mumford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. KlinckSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- People v. CowartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- State v. Ortiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.