Legal Opinion

Masin v. La Marche

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1982No. Civ. 63467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Plaintiffs Joseph and Eva Masin, the owners of 34 acres of land in Montecito, California (hereinafter called the Masins), appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants after a court trial on plaintiffs’ complaint to enjoin interference with an appurtenant access and utility easement claimed to burden defendants’ land. The trial court held that plaintiffs’ access easement had been terminated or extinguished by abandonment and adverse possession. However, the trial court also held that the public utility portion of the easement had not been extinguished.

Plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Zimmer v. DykstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. City of Vallejo v. ScallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vieira Enterprises, Inc. v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Sevier v. LocherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API