Legal Opinion

Sevier v. Locher

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1990No. A047029PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that a transfer of title to real property after

the prescriptive period for adverse possession of the property has begun does not interrupt or terminate the running of the prescription period. Adverse possession refers to occupation or use of land adverse to legal title, not to a particular holder of legal title.

On June 21, 1988, Ronald and Nancy Sevier filed a complaint to quiet title in which they alleged that on November 4, 1986, they acquired by grant deed a parcel of real property and an easement over a strip of land running along the edge of that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Leonard v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sabino Town & Country Estates Ass'n v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Vieira Enterprises, Inc. v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. McLear-Gary v. Scott, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Bailey v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Kaut v. Kelsey CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API