Legal Opinion

City of Vallejo v. Scally

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1923No. Sac. No, 3387PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.

On July 11, 1893, the defendant and his wife deeded to the plaintiff, the City of Vallejo, a right of way over certain real property “for any water pipes or mains which may be laid by the City of Vallejo, the party of the second part, and the right to maintain such water pipes, provided that all water pipes and mains shall be laid so that not less than one and one-half feet of ground shall cover such water pipes or mains, and that in no case shall the said water pipes interfere with the proper cultivation of the land of the party of the first part, and also the use of so much land as is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Home Real Estate Co. v. the L.A. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Currier v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Parker v. SwettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Gardner v. San Gabriel Valley BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Quinn v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Watson v. HegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. City of Vallejo v. BurrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. City of Stockton v. Miles and Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API