Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Ainsworth

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1947No. 36530PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGhee, J.

This is a suit brought in chancery by the appellees, Mrs. D. 0. Ainsworth and her son Willard Ainsworth, for an accounting and to recover all sums of money paid in connection with the purchase of' a used automobile, upon the theory that the difference between what the car could have been purchased from the dealer for in cash and the amount which the purchaser had to pay for'the same on credit amounted to more than 20% interest per annum, and was therefore usurious, provided the amount which the dealer and the finance company term a “time price differential (including finance, insurance, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Rattan v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Galloway v. Travelers Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hutto v. JordanMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Tower Underwriters, Inc. v. LottMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ready-Mix Concrete & Concrete Products Co. v. PerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mullins v. Merchandise Sales CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API