Hutto v. Jordan

This case was originated by a replevin action in the County Court of Harrison County, involving the possession of an automobile sold to appellee, with title retained by the contract of sale, which contract was assigned to appellant by the seller.

Proper affidavit was made, and declaration filed. Defendant, appellee, filed a plea of the general issue and a “counter claim,” by which latter he sought to have the car returned to him on the theory that the total interest contracted to be paid “was $85.28 which interest is far in excess of 20% per annum. Therefore the contract was null and void, ’ ’…