Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Prendergast

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 8, 2010No. 26889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the Commission) investigated an allegation of misconduct against Sean J. Prendergast (Respondent) involving Respondent’s solicitation of a client to invest funds in a commercial real estate venture. After a full investigation, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed Formal Charges against Respondent. Following a hearing, 1 a Hearing Panel of the Commission (the Panel) found Respondent had committed misconduct and recommended that the Court impose a definite suspension for a period of two years. Neither the ODC nor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. In Re HazzardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. In re WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re LongtinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. In re SamahaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. In the Matter of Eric J. DavidsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. In Re HurseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. In re DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API