Legal Opinion

Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1961No. 39203PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Custer, Judge.

A plaintiff seeking to hold a defendant liable for the acts of its agent committed within the scope of the agent's authority may allege such agency simply by stating that the defendant, acting through its named agent, did the act in question. This allegation is sufficient as against both general and special demurrer. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 81 Ga. App. 324 (2) (58 SE2d 559). The fact that it is also alleged in the petition that the named agents were agents for both the defendant and another corporation in selling applications for the stock options directed to such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Aderhold v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Floyd County v. SalmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Flournoy v. Highlands Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Herrin v. LámarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Georgia Power Co. v. RabunCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance v. FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance v. DurcinkaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API