Legal Opinion

Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance v. Flanigan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1967No. 42781, 42782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

Construing the petitions as amended against the pleaders, the amendments as above stated only serve to emphasize the fact, as shown by the original petitions, that whatever representations were made preceded the execution of *819an application form, and were used as an inducement to each of the plaintiffs to execute and deliver to the defendant an application or subscription to what each plaintiff believed was an investment program. The petitions are still silent as to any fraud perpetrated by the defendant which prevented either plaintiff from ascertaining the contents of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clinton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Adamson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Adamson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Coral Gables Corp. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Holbrook v. Capital Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Life Insurance v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Flanigan v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Public Savings Life Insurance v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Public Savings Life Insurance v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API