Flournoy v. Highlands Hotel Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. There is no such doctrine known to the law as a set-off of Avrongs. Not even estoppel can legalize or vitalize that which the law declares unlawful, and void. If so, the conduct of individuals, AAdiether independently or collusively, could render any -and all laws invalid and impotent. Ordinarily any of the circumstances to which our attention is directed by the Court of Appeals would work an estoppel; but the express proAnsion in the securities law relating to the sale of securities in violation of the regulations of the State and its public policy debars the courts from giving their aid…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Corey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Georgia Public Service Commission v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Smith v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Britton v. BowdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Gilbert v. MeasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.