Legal Opinion

Aderhold v. Zimmer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1952No. 33956PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

“Wilful misrepresentation of a material fact, made to induce another to act, and upon which he does act to his injury, will give a right of action. Mere concealment of such a fact, unless done in such a manner as to deceive and mislead, will not support an action. In all cases of deceit, knowledge of the falsehood constitutes an essential element. A fraudulent or reckless representation of facts as true, which the party may not know to be false, if intended to deceive, is equivalent to a knowledge of the falsehood.” Code, § 106-302. An independent action in tort for deceit must be grounded on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Young v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Norris v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  5. Mills v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jones v. SpindelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Bill Spreen Toyota, Inc. v. JenquinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. King v. TownsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Rustin Oldsmobile, Inc. v. KendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API