Legal Opinion

Floyd County v. Salmon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1921No. 1985PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Certiorari; from Court of Appeals. 24 Ga. App. 796.

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

The Civil Code (1910), § 1202, provides that “the county shall pay the receiver one half of what the collector gets for collecting the county tax.” By an act of the General Assembly, approved August 17, 1918 (Acts 1918, p. 110), section 1202 of the Civil Code of 1910 was so amended as to be read as follows: “ The county shall pay the receiver the same compensation the collector *314gets for collecting the county tax.” J. Z. Salmon, tax-receiver of Floyd county, claimed as such receiver, for the year 1918, the same compensation allowed the tax-collector for collecting the county tax. The county…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Park v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Epstin v. Levenson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Green v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Bibb County v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Anderson v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. Sirota v. Kay Homes Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Aldridge v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API