Dorn v. Home Farmers Mutual Insurance Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order of the district court denying its motion for judgment n. o. v., or, alternatively, for a new trial.
We affirm.
The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows.
On July 14, 1971, a hailstorm inflicted damage upon the crops of plaintiffs, all of whom conduct farming operations in Nicollet County, Minnesota. It is uncontested that these damaged crops were covered by hail insurance policies issued by defendant.
Thereafter defendant dispatched Leslie R. Leet to ascertain the extent of hail damage inflicted. Leet inspected plaintiffs’ fields early in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Hestad v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Strampe v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Stapleman v. St. Joseph the WorkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Phelps v. Blomberg Roseville ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Fritz v. Arnold Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Boland v. GarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Coleman v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.