Legal Opinion

Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1983No. L.A. 31654PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

In December 1980, plaintiffs Sea and Sage Audubon Society, Inc., and the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians brought this administrative mandamus action against defendant City of Anaheim (city), challenging the city’s approval of a development project proposed by real party in interest Texaco-Anaheim Hills, Inc. (Anaheim Hills). The trial court granted summary judgment against plaintiffs on the ground that they had failed to ex*415haust their administrative remedies. On this appeal, plaintiffs challenge the dismissal of their action on several theories not raised below, asserting that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Ogo Associates v. City of TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Pool v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Ford v. GouinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API