Legal Opinion
Village of Wellsville v. Village of Andover
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that portion of defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action. Plaintiff asserts therein that the parties entered into a joint venture regarding the operation of plaintiff’s landfill and that, as part of that joint venture, defendants are responsible for paying a portion of the costs associated with leachate collection and disposal from the landfill after its closure in 1983. The record, however, fails to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steinbeck v. GerosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Steinbeck v. GerosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ramirez v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Hasday v. BarocasNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Mendelson v. FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Wesselmann v. International Images, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Alper Restaurant, Inc. v. Catamount Development CorporationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Baldwin v. BradtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bochman v. Town of CheektowagaNew York Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.