Legal Opinion
Steinbeck v. Gerosa
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 13, 1958No. 294PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Per curiam
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
2Cited by59 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R. C. Stamm & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Kyle v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.