Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Perkins

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1894No. 15206PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This is an action to foreclose a lien for materials used and work done by subcontractors in the construction of a building for the defendant, Perkins.

The court below gave judgment for the defendants upon the ground that the claim of lien was not filed in time, and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment on the judgment-roll.

The only question in the case is, was the claim of lien filed within the time required by statute?

The court found the facts to be, in substance, as follows: On August 13, 1889, one E. W. Hyde entered into a written contract with defendant Perkins, to erect for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valley Lumber Co. v. StruckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Marshall v. Vallejo Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lucas v. HustaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API